Thursday, December 16, 2010

The War of Spanish Succession Thesis

The War of Spanish Succession was a direct result of Louis XIV attempting to use his grandson, Philip V, to make an international monarchy that would allow him ultimate power throughout Europe. 

Saturday, December 11, 2010

Dutch Republic Free Response Question

Discuss ways that the 17th-century Dutch Republic differed from its neighbors, telling how these differences contributed to the country's success.

       The Dutch Republic in the 1600s came to be known as the "Golden Age of the Netherlands." Some even went as far to call it "an island of plenty in a sea of want." The Dutch Republic strategically worked their way to become a power in Western Europe in the 1600s. The Dutch Republic differed from France within the fact that they had a hard working middle class that did not live life excessively at home which led to success; but the Dutch  differed from England because they did not have strong military forces to keep control of their colonies or fight wars and therefore led to its downfall.

      The Dutch Republic prospered because of a hard working merchant class. The merchant class prospered especially in banking and trade. The Dutch had their own gold, florin, that eventually became the international unit of monetary exchange. Amsterdam, a city in the Dutch Republic, was the center of world banking. The Dutch were successful in trade because of the vast variety of ships they owned, and the expertise they showed in fishing and building canals. Despite these successes in the workplace, the Dutch did not live excessively at home. The Dutch did not decorate their homes with ornate art and architecture like homes in France. The Dutch spent their money on food and other necessities. In France, home were decorated elegantly with expensive artwork, and they built their houses for beauty not comfortability. The Dutch knew what was important to succeed.

      The Dutch Republic in the 17th-century had established colonies all over the world. In North America, the Dutch had established the important colony of New Amsterdam. New Amsterdam was located within the bigger Dutch colony of New Netherlands. New Amsterdam was along the Hudson River, and therefore provided many opportunities for trade in North America. However, New Amsterdam was coveted by England. England had several colonies surrounding the Dutch colonies, and was in a hurry to take over the Dutch's property. England was able to annex New Amsterdam because England had one thing that the Dutch did not: a strong military. No matter how successful the Dutch were in trade and banking, they lacked a strong army. The English easily defeated the Dutch and took over New Amsterdam and renamed it New York.

       The Netherlands' military was unsuccessful in winning wars, along with keeping control of colonies. The English annexing of New Amsterdam was part of three short wars between the English and the Dutch known as the Anglo-Dutch Wars. The wars were prompted by the English introducing an act called the Navigation Act. The act caused tensions between the Dutch and the English and started the wars. These wars ultimately led to the downfall of the Netherlands' "golden age." The Dutch's already weak military was split between fighting the English and defending itself from Louis XIV of France who was always looking to expand his empire.

         During the 17th-century the Netherlands experienced a type of golden age. This golden age prospered because of differences between other European countries such as France and England, but also failed because of those differences. The main differences that led to the success and eventually the downfall of the Dutch Republic were the simple life the Dutch led and the lack of a strong army.

Friday, December 10, 2010

Google Map Pepy's Diary

http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?hl=en&ie=UTF8&msa=0&msid=118215166848705488656.00049646f2ca5b811bd27&t=h&z=10

Monday, December 6, 2010

Free Response Practice Test #1



"Why are the trials and tribulations of Galileo often considered both predicative of the future of Western Civilization as well as a perfect encapsulation of the context of his own time?"


           Galileo was man of many parts. Galileo dedicated his life to the sciences, and was later recognized as one of the founding fathers of modern science. He was faced with difficult decisions in life about science, religion, and loyalty but he ultimately choose what was right for himself. Galileo encompassed the future of science and the context of his own time through his trials and tribulations which included the invention of a new telescope, further supporting of the Copernican theory, and his choice to stand by heliocentrism instead of geocentricism which was ultimately a fundamental belief of the Catholic Church and made him a heretic.


           As a young boy, Galileo never dreamed of becoming a scientist. However, after studying to be a doctor while at a university he realized he was much more interested in the worlds of mathematics and science. Galileo went on to study and develop ideas about kinematics, the tides, and Copernicus' theory. He studied the acceleration of objects and all matters dealing with kinematics so thoroughly that he was later labeled the father of physics. However, Galileo made a huge contribution to the future of modern science with the invention of a new telescope. Galileo created a telescope with about 30x magnification which allowed for great study of earth, the skies, and eventually outer space. His telescope is often thought of as a terrestrial telescope, but it also allowed for an early view of the stars and planets. The magnification for which the telescope was able to reach was an example of the future of science because nothing that precise had ever been created before. Although, his telescope still reflected his own times because he only had so many tools from which to make his telescope. His scientific advancement was limited by the technology of his time.

          Galileo was a strong believer in Copernicus' theory. He agreed with scientist Nicholas Copernicus on his theory that the earth was not the center of the universe, but the sun was. By stating this belief, Galileo went against his own times because this theory clashed with the Catholic religion. He making the choice of science over religion. Galileo made his beliefs known and was always trying to provide new evidence in the favor of Copernicus' theory. This was a futuristic way of doing things since most men or women of the time would not have made public their ideas that went against the teaching of the Catholic Church. It could also be argued that Galileo was also a man of his time. He could be thought of as a religious revolutionary since he chose science over religion. All around Europe, religious revolutions were being started for different reasons. Why should science not be a reason? Galileo was summoned to the Catholic Inquisition, but he was able to avoid persecution since his friend was a bishop. This friend would later become Pope Urban VIII. Galileo was told though that he needed to stop his research into Copernicus' theory since it went against Catholic teaching. 
         
           Galileo continued on in his research, despite his close run in with the Inquisition. He was determined to prove that Copernicus was right. Galileo had made his own telescope, and through rigorous study and observation he knew the sun was the center of the universe, not the earth. He decided to write a book that showed his evidence in support of Copernicus' theory. The Catholic Church, however, learned that Galileo was writing a book. At the time, Pope Urban VIII and Galileo were no longer as close of friends since being pope demanded much of Pope Urban's time. Galileo was summoned again to the Inquisition, but his time he was persecuted as a heretic. He was forced to say that Copernicus' theory was incorrect, he was put on house arrest for the rest of his life, and any of his writings or future writings were banned from being published. But all of this did not stop Galileo. Galileo continued to write books and study astronomy, along with other sciences. Galileo was a revolutionary in this sense, and pointed towards modern times since he refused to let religion erase his beliefs. He was not a dumb man though, so he followed the rules of his house arrest and did not attempt to publish any of his works. Galileo was a perfect mix of the present and the future.

          Galileo was a revolutionary. He was also a man of his time. He had a myriad of ideas and theories, but he knew how to push the envelope with them, without actually bursting it. He tried to point to the future, while trying to maintain the ideas of the present. Galileo was able to maintain a mixture of present and future through his trials and tribulations because of his modern observations, his choice of science over religion, and his continuation of his beliefs.